--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Chairs' Advisory Committee Reflector ---Hi Mark and Stephen,I like Mark am not asking for a great effort, but looking to the scheme.As I believe Stephen is trying to work the timeline:only in inverse order, and of course moving TGbh to Amendment 1 location.As I understand it, the drafts push to the published portion as they are published, soFrom the Bottom up (if I have it right).TGbfTGbeTGbhREVmeTGbcTGbbLet me know if I am misunderstanding something,Jon-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jon Rosdahl Engineer, Senior Staff
IEEE 802 Executive Secretary Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
office: 801-492-4023 10871 North 5750 West
cell: 801-376-6435 Highland, UT 84003
A Job is only necessary to eat!
A Family is necessary to be happy!!On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:43 PM Mark Hamilton <mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Chairs' Advisory Committee Reflector ---HI, Stephen,
First, thanks for the updates for TGbh. That is a huge relief for me, personally.
Second, how painful is it to edit this page? I gather from your comments in Atlanta that it is pretty bad. Is there anything I can do to help? I bring it up, because I notice a bunch of things that might clean it up a bit, but I hesitate to ask unless it isn’t too hard to do and/or I can be involved in the effort. For example:
- It would be nice if the amendments were listed in order. It’s kind of confusing currently, in that it sort if implies an order, when there really isn’t one (shown).
- I think the dependencies of 11bd and 11az on 802.11me must in incorrect. Or, is there some “depended on some early draft of REVme that added/changed something” dependency going on? (That doesn’t seem right, in a published amendment, though…?)
- The ordering of the dependencies would make more sense to me if 11az and 11bd were listed above REVme – this is assuming the dependencies are meant to be in any sort of order, which they sort of are, but perhaps there is work to do there, too?
- REVme should depend on 11az, 11bd, 11bb and 11bc, right? I know that isn’t really official, until all those are published, but 11az and 11bd are published, and there is agreement in the amendment ordering about 11bb and 11bc and all the other rows show the dependencies based on the amendment ordering.
Like I said, _PLEASE_ don’t take this as a request for you to do more work, or as a comment on the work you’ve done. Just things that I think would help those who are trying to understand the process, and ONLY IF I CAN HELP!
Thanks. Mark
From: *** IEEE stds-802-11-cac List *** <STDS-802-11-CAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Stephen McCann
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 1:13 PM
To: STDS-802-11-CAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-CAC] Timeline chart
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Chairs' Advisory Committee Reflector ---
Dear all,
I've updated the timeline chart:
Please can you check your project for any errors please.
I have changed the order of 11bh, so it now comes before 11be. I've also updated a couple of dates, based on updated timelines. Thanks.
Kind regards
Stephen
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-CAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-CAC&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-CAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-CAC&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-CAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-CAC&A=1
