AT&T, Intel, NAB, Qualcomm, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless
file
what they agree on:
· Adopt a contiguous “down from TV 51” approach with
uplink at the top;
· Maximize the amount of paired spectrum above TV 37 (rely on supplemental downlink configurations where spectrum is cleared
but pairing options are not viable);
· Rely upon 5 MHz spectrum blocks as building blocks for the band plan;
· Incorporate a “duplex gap” or spacing between uplink (mobile transmit) and downlink (base transmit) of a minimum of 10 MHz,
but no larger than technically necessary;
· Avoid broadcast television stations in the duplex gap;
· Preclude any operations in the duplex gap or guard bands that would result in harmful interference to adjacent licensed services;
· Provide guard bands that are, consistent with the statute, “no larger than is technically reasonable” to guard against harmful
interference between adjacent operations;
· Provide a guard band between a high power broadcaster and mobile downlink that is sufficient to protect the wireless service
from interference, which will likely be larger than the 6 MHz proposed by the FCC;
· Permit existing operations in TV 37 to remain;
· Facilitate international harmonization, prioritizing harmonization across North America and move forward expeditiously to
coordinate with Canada and Mexico for new broadcast assignments.
From: *** Regulatory and Spectrum Allocation Topics *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-REG@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Peter Ecclesine (pecclesi)
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 6:23 AM
To: STDS-802-11-REG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-REG] FCC TV bands proceeding comments posted Docket 12-268
FCC TV bands Incentive Auction comment period closes January 25th. There are 100 comments posted at this moment.
Enter Proceeding 12-268 [today there are 93 comments posted]
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment_search/input?z=8zmni
e.g., SpectrumBridge
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022110952
should be lots more reading in the next week along the lines of
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022110894
petere
Peter Ecclesine, Technology Analyst
MS SJ-14-4 170 West Tasman Dr, San Jose, CA 95134-1706
Ph 408/527-0815, FAX 408/525-9256
"Time doesn't fool around." "Without Prejudice" U.C.C. 1-207
_______________________________________________________________________________
If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect.
Instead, go to
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-REG and then press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________
If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect.
Instead, go to http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-REG and then press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________