| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
John, Thank you for your ideas here. I thought we had reached consensus on the questions as currently written; however, if group determines the changes
are warranted, I'd like to offer a friendly amendment. I think we should append "...if it would enhance band sharing" to your last sentence. After all, that was the whole point of the approach.
So, from: Would you support a change to FCC parts 90 and 95 so that this designation is removed from Channel 172 and instead is applied to Channel 180, 182
or 184? to: Would you support a change to FCC parts 90 and 95 so that this designation is removed from Channel 172 and instead is applied to Channel 180, 182
or 184 if it would enhance band sharing? This may necessitate adding back in the "I don't support band sharing" answer. Comments welcome. Andy Scott Vice President of Engineering National Cable & Telecommunications Association 25 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Suite 100
Washington DC, 20001 202.222.2475 From: ***
Regulatory and Spectrum Allocation Topics *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-REG@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of John Kenney Hi All: I realize not all Tiger Team participants are on this mail list, but I hope enough are that it will be useful to initiate a discussion here on a TT topic. In preparation for our further discussion of Straw Poll questions this Friday, I want to make a comment and a suggestion concerning Question 5, which currently (11-15-0174/r0)
reads:
If it would enhance band sharing, would you support a proposal to move the V2V Safety Channel (currently in Channel 172) to one of the upper channels
(180, 182, or 184)? (Note: this could require a rule change) Question 6 is a companion question that was split out in order to separately test two related ideas. I believe the intent of Question 5 can be stated as follows (corrections
or alternate views welcome): Test whether people support changing which channel carries the FCC designation as the V2V Safety Channel. Currently that is Ch. 172, and the questions asks if a voter favors moving that designation to one of the upper three channels.
By contrast, Q6 asks if a voter supports moving the Basic Safety Messages from Ch. 172 to one of the upper channels, but with no change in FCC designations.
To help the voter understand the difference, we discussed including something about rule changes in the question language. As noted above, currently Q5 includes a parenthetical
"Note: this could require a rule change". Q6 has a similar parenthetical stating "no rule change". I believe Q5 would be more effective if it clearly asks whether the voter favors a rule change. This way the voters will all interpret the question the same way. My
suggested revision is: In Memorandum Opinion & Order FCC 06-110 the FCC designates DSRC Channel 172:
Would you support a change to FCC parts 90 and 95 so that this designation is removed from Channel 172 and instead is applied to Channel
180, 182 or 184? The offered answers would be:
We would no longer need the "I don't support band sharing" answer because I deleted the leading "If it would enhance band sharing" Comments welcome. Best Regards, John --
John Kenney Principal Researcher Toyota InfoTechnology Center, USA 465 Bernardo Avenue Mountain View, CA 94043 Tel: 650-694-4160. Mobile: 650-224-6644 _______________________________________________________________________________
If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect.
Instead, go to
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-REG and then press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________
If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect. Instead, go to http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-REG and then press the LEAVE button. Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________ |