| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear all, I have received two comments in the past week. ·
Comment from Adrian: For the unapproved document with proposed content, it is required to stick with the word document submission with title, author,
and affiliation. ·
Comment from Yunsong: There is an error for the SYNC field duration of MCS0 and MCS1 in the table. To address the comment, I have changed the submission format to the word document format and fixed the error in the table. Please see
the link below for the revised version.
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/17/11-17-1585-02-00ba-proposed-draft-specification.docx Thanks Adrian and Yunsong again for the comments. Please let me know if there are further comments.
Best, Po-Kai Dear all, As discussed in Nov f2f meeting, Bin has kindly helped us to revise the WUR PHY skeleton and provide two tables for timing-related parameters and
frequently used parameters. I have incorporated the changes in D0.01. Please check the link below. (See Clause 32 for the skeleton change. See table 32-1 and 32-2 for the proposed parameters.) The RTF files for each clause are also attached.
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/17/11-17-1585-01-00ba-proposed-draft-specification.pdf I believe that PHY spec writing is a continuous process. Please let us know if there are further comments to improve D0.01 and help on the spec
writing process. Best, Po-Kai |