Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Comments on "0755 Non-STR AP"
Rui,
1, Yes, we think sufficient isolation between 5 and 6GHz is costly considering the form factor of a STA MLD.
2, Yes, essentially we would like to avoid all cases such that a non-STR MLD needs to do simultaneous TX and RX.
Best regards,
Jinjing
> On Jun 18, 2020, at 10:44 AM, Rui Yang <Rui.Yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Jinjing,
>
> Thank you for reaching out for questions. I have two simple ones:
>
> 1. Under the assumption of non-STR or legacy STAs (which, of course, can't do STR either), do you think the isolation between 5GHz and 6GHz band is a major issue?
>
> 2. Do you think the rule in your slide 8 is also applicable to the case where STA MLD is STR and AP-MLD is non-STR?
>
> Best regards,
> Rui
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jinjing Jiang <jinjing@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 8:17 PM
> To: George Cherian <gcherian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Zhou Lan <zhou.lan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; liyunbo@xxxxxxxxxx; Das, Dibakar <dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx>; Cariou, Laurent <laurent.cariou@xxxxxxxxx>; Srinivas Kandala <srini.k1@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Yongho Seok <Yongho.Seok@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; liwen.chu@xxxxxxx; Rui Yang <Rui.Yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Comments on "0755 Non-STR AP"
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> Due to the time constraints at the conference call, I was not able to collect all the comments and answer questions on the Non-STR AP contribution.
> Please kindly share your thoughts through this thread, I will try to answer.
>
> Thanks and best regards,
>
> Jinjing
________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1