Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] [EXT] RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Data-field-Coding



Hi Yujin,

 

  I agree the bracket is not needed. But it is not wrong to have it either, right? The contents inside bracket just indicate the portion of the bits in the last segment. I am not adding m_stbc outside the bracket. I know STBC feature is removed. I can remove the bracket if you think it is more readable.

 

Thanks

Yan

 

From: Yujin Noh <yujin.noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 11:44 PM
To: Yan(msi) Zhang <yan.zhang_5@xxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [EXT] RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Data-field-Coding

 

Caution: EXT Email

Hi Yan,

 

As for the Table, I missed the point you mentioned which is valid.

Thank you for the clarification.

 

By the way, a_init should be 3 in Eq. 34-3.11.5-11. What I intended was just to remove bracket in the Equation.

Removing mSTBC (in STBC is decided not to be supported in 11be), the bracket is not necessary anymore.

 

Regards,

Yujin

 

From: Yan(msi) Zhang <yan.zhang_5@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 8:33 PM
To: Yujin Noh <yujin.noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [EXT] RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Data-field-Coding

 

Hi Yujin,

 

   Thank you for your comments. I will update the document after all MCS values are finalized. a_init = 3 is typo, it should be 4.

 

   For Nsd,short for 3x996, since it is 2x996+996, if we use the 3xNsd,short for 996 tone, then the last segment is much larger than the first 3 segments, while simply adding Nsd_short for 2x996 and Nsd,short for 996, it is much more balanced among 4 segments. That’s why I choose 732 instead of 720 as Nsd_short for 3x996. Also for other MRUs, we just simply summing up the Nsd,short for corresponding RUs.

 

Thanks

Yan

 

From: Yujin Noh <yujin.noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 1:34 PM
To: Yan(msi) Zhang <yan.zhang_5@xxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EXT] RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Data-field-Coding

 

Caution: EXT Email

Hi Yan,

 

Thank you for sharing the draft.

Please find my comments in attached.

 

By the way, the link below is not correct.

 

Regards,

Yujin

 

From: Yan(msi) Zhang <yan.zhang_5@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 11:02 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Data-field-Coding

 

Dear Data field Coding TTT,

 

I have uploaded the draft for Data field Coding  to the server https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1339-01-00be-pdt-phy-mathematical-description-of-signals.docx. Please review it and give your feedback.....

 

Thanks

Yan

 


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1