Hi, Ross
Thank you for the comment. I originally have the same thoughts, and that is how I compose Annex E for Draft 0.3. And I realize that the
Operating class should not be abused, so yes, it may not be proper to split.
Then I feel that we shall find better place to define 320-1 and 320-2 other than Annex E, because we never define any BW (20/40/80/160 and 80+80) in Annex E. I think we can discuss during the PHY meeting to find
a proper location for this definition.
Best,
Ruchen
From: Yujian (Ross Yu) [mailto:ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 10:46 PM
To: Ruchen Duan <r.duan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 答复: CR for 36.3.22 and Annex E uploaded
Hi Ruchen,
Can you clarify why we need two different operating class in Annex E for 320-1 and 320-2?
I think the comment just wants to have some description of what is 320-1 and what is 320-2. You can add some description, which is similar as in SFD.
In addition to four entries for 20/40/80/160MHz, there exists two entries in U-SIG BW field for 320 MHz:
・
320-1 if PPDU channel center frequency is 31, 95, 159.
・
320-2 if PPDU channel center frequency is 63, 127, 191.
[Motion 135, #SP237, [48] and [80]]
regards
于健
Ross Jian Yu
Huawei Technologies
发件人:
Ruchen Duan [mailto:r.duan@xxxxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2021年3月10日 4:15
收件人:
STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] CR for 36.3.22 and Annex E uploaded
Hi, Alfred, Sigurd and Tianyu
Please add the following document to the PHY queue.
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/21/11-21-0424-00-00be-cr-for-36-3-22-and-annex-e.doc
Thank you and best,
Ruchen
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1