| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Alice, That’s a good point. I will update it based on your two comments. Regards, Yujin From: Alice Jialing Li <jialing.li.phd2@xxxxxxxxx> **BE CAUTIOUS**
THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED FROM OUTSIDE SENSCOMM. DO
NOT CLICK ANY LINKS OR OPEN ATTACHMENTS UNLESS YOU RECONGNIZE THE SENDER AND KNOW THE CONTENTS ARE SAFE. ALSO BE CAUTIOUS WHEN ‘REPLYING TO ALL’. Hi Yujin, Two comments to Table 36-x2 in the PDT: 1. For the OFDMA case, do you need to refer to the 4-bit bitmap (B3-B6 of U-SIG-1) to be more specific? 2. Is there a need to split each CBW into the nonpunctured case and punctured case? Note that the non-OFDMA case includes the nonpunctured pattern. In the next spec draft which will incorporate resolved CIDs in the U-SIG subclause, the
pattern '1111' would be added to the OFDMA case as well. So, the nonpunctured case is just a special case to the general _expression_ of the punctured pattern. Best regards, Alice Chen Qualcomm On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 12:40 PM Yujin Noh <Yujin.Noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |