thank you for your submission and taking the questions/comments.
All operations of TWT Recommendation value 5 flow are possible with a value 4 flow. I am wondering why we need the value 5 option?
- P2P transmissions have own clock that synchronize these transmissions. It is very hard to synchronize the AP clock and the P2P clock.
- The UL and DL TID limitations allow AP to dictate what traffic is transmitted in the rTWT SP. This is causes poor SP utilization, complicates STA scheduling and degrades overall QoS.
Cheers,
Jarkko
On Sep 30, 2021, at 08:18, Muhammad Kumail Haider <kumail.ieee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hello all,Following up on the discussion in today’s call. There were several people still in the queue; I noted Rubayet, Jarkko, Guogang, Liwen, Liangxiao, Stephane and Qi. Please let me know your comments/questions and appreciate the feedback!Kumail.On Sep 29, 2021, at 5:30 PM, Muhammad Kumail Haider <kumail.ieee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hello all,I received several comments since Rev.4 was posted and had offline discussions as well. Based on feedback, the doc is updated to Rev.6 11-21/1224 CC 36 CR for Restricted TWT Setup. Please review and let me know if there are any further comments/questions.Best regards,KumailOn Sep 20, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Muhammad Kumail Haider <kumail.ieee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hello all,I have updated 11-21/1224 CC 36 CR for Restricted TWT Setup to Rev.4 based on feedback from the group and offline discussions. Please let me know if there are any further comments/questions.Best regards,KumailTo unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1