|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Thanks for your quick response.
If that's the case, I think it would be more clear to be described as a positive sentence rather than a negative one as below.
⎯ If the r-TWT scheduled STA is
From: Chunyu Hu <chunyuhu07@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 5:58 PM
To: Kiseon Ryu <kryu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Call for review of restricted TWT CR doc 11-21/1802
The case you are asking is covered in the second "If ..." bullet.
However, removing the text in red is not equivalent to the sum of the two cases.
First it contradicts that the r-TWT schedule STA can be a member of a r-TWT schedule and we don't want to exclude this case. We would need to change "any" to "a".
But that won't work as it contradicts to the baseline behavior we still want the r-TWT STA to follow where it is member of a non rTWT broadcast TWT schedule, it would be still required to wake up at the start times of a different non rTWT broadcast TWT schedule.
As such, it's best to list these two cases as in current text.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:23 PM Kiseon Ryu <kryu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1