Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Discussion on 1793 TID Mapping Enhancements

Hello Atsushi, 
Thanks for your comment below, these fields could potentially be used without the Priority bit, but I agree if the group does not see a use case when the priority bit is not set then we can reserve them again.

Best
Pooya

On Wednesday, April 27, 2022, 03:46:23 AM PDT, SHIRAKAWA Atsushi <shirakawa.atsushi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Hello Pooya

 

 

It seems existence of Mapping switch Count field and Duration field only depends on value of Priority subfield,

New assignment for Mapping Switch Count Preset and Duration Present in TID-To-Link Control field format is really needed

or just consume Reserved bit in vain ?

 

Sincerely

Atsushi

 

From: Pooya Monajemi <00000ef0b9e0aff7-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 9:17 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Discussion on 1793 TID Mapping Enhancements

 

Hello all, 

Opening this thread to discuss 1793, please reply with your comments

 

Many thanks

Pooya 

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1