Hi Mengshi,
Thank you for addressing some of my comments.
Still, I have some concerns. One of them may be explained using the figure you added. Based on your current CR, the CSI variation values corresponding to “0” and “1” (the green bar in the figure
below) are implementation dependent. So, for different responder, “0” and “1” may corresponding to different set of values. Does AP need to know those values? Also, for each responder, does the CSI variation values corresponding to “0” and “1” remain the same
over time, or they may change from measurement to measurement? If they may change, is the feedback value between 0 and 1 still meaningful? Thanks.
Best regards,
Ray
From: humengshi <0000179fd8c5ace5-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 5:38 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] 答复: About 11-22-1758
Hi Rui,
Thanks for your comments. Attached please find the updated CR document.
Regarding CID 284,
to make it clear, I delete the word “degree”, and the NOTE is moved to the right place. More details can be found in the updated version. Also, I draw a figure to help understand in the discussion part.
Regarding CID 559,
I use “CSI variation threshold = 0” instead of
“only showing 0 there”. Regarding adding some descriptions on how the threshold is used and compared with the CSI variation feedback value, I think this should be included in the subclause 11 instead of the
element introduction part. And if you go to subclause 11 threshold part, there already exists the related descriptions on how the threshold is used. Thus I do not write the descriptions here. If you still think the element part should contain the behavior
(how to use it), I think we can further discuss it in the meeting.
Your further comments and suggestions are welcome.
Best regards,
Mengshi Hu
发件人:
Rui Yang <Rui.Yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
发送时间: 2022年10月18日 5:17
收件人: humengshi <humengshi@xxxxxxxxxx>
抄送:
STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: About 11-22-1758
Hi Mengshi,
Thank you again for resolving some comments related to the threshold based sensing. Attached please find the copy of your
contribution with my comments, questions, and suggested changes.
Best regards,
Ray
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1