Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Updated TGbn Agenda Posted

Hi Alfred,

 

Please enqueue the following SP to the MAC queue:

 

 

Do you agree that UHR should allow more than two TIDs to be mapped to high priority ACs (i.e., VO or VI)?

o             Upto one TID for each AC currently assigned to BE and BK are remapped.

o             Those TIDs may be used dynamically (e.g., following an SCS flow setup).

 

Supporting docs: 24/463r1, 24/1899, 23/0069

 

Regards,

Dibakar

 

 

From: Das, Dibakar
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2025 1:03 AM
To: asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx; STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Updated TGbn Agenda Posted

 

Hi Alfred,

 

Please enqueue the following SP to the MAC queue:

 

Do you agree to define a mechanism as part of the procedure of time sharing during a TXOP (e.g. C-TDMA, TXS, …) to support fairness to neighboring STAs (APs and non-APs)?

    • Exact mechanism is TBD.

 

 

Regards,

Dibakar

 

From: Das, Dibakar
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2025 10:28 AM
To: asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx; STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Updated TGbn Agenda Posted

 

Hi Alfred,

 

Please add the following two SPs to MAC queue.

 

CTDMA:

  1. Do you agree that:
    1. The maximum time allocated by a sharing AP in a TXOP to all shared AP for CTDMA is not higher than the TXOP limit it advertised for the minimum between AC_VI TxOP limit and the TxOP Limit of the AC it obtains the TxOP with to its associated STAs.
      1. If TXOP limit for an AC is 0, there is no CTDMA in a TXOP obtained using that AC.
    2. The sharing AP shall use at least a TBD portion of the TXOP it shares for data communication with its own associated STAs.
    3. Note: same for TXS mode 2

 

QoS:

 

Do you agree that UHR should allow more than two TIDs to be mapped to high priority ACs (i.e., VO or VI)?

o             Upto one TID for each AC currently assigned to BE and BK are remapped.

o             Those TIDs may be used dynamically (e.g., following an SCS flow setup).

 

 

All: please provide any feedback on the SPs.

 

 

Regards,

Dibakar

 

From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2025 2:00 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Updated TGbn Agenda Posted

 

Hello all,

 

I posted an updated version of the agenda (here).

 

It contains the most up to data queues and the allocations for the week. Please review and let me know if I have missed anything. 

 

PS: I have yet to populate the SPs with the usual format for PHY/MAC/Joint. I expect to do so for the next revision of the agenda.

 

Regards,


Alfred

 

--

Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD

IEEE802.11 TGbe/TGbn Chair,

Qualcomm Technologies Inc.

Cell #:    +1 858 263 9445

Office #: +1 858 658 5302

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1