| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | 
| Hi Alfred,  Can you please add the following motion on
CTDMA/TXOP sharing to the TGbn agenda for voting? Do you agree that: 
 Note: similar consideration will apply for TXS mode 2 Supporting List: [24/0093]   SP result in MAC ad-hoc: unanimous.  Regards, Dibakar From: Das, Dibakar <dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx>
 Hi Alfred, Could you please queue the following motion on CTDMA/TXOP sharing to the TGbn agenda for voting?:  Do you agree to define a mechanism as part of the procedure of time sharing during a TXOP (e.g. C-TDMA, TXS, …) to support fairness to neighboring STAs (APs and non-APs)? 
 SP Result:
(don’t recall) think it was 144Y/27N Regards, Dibakar From: Akhmetov, Dmitry <Dmitry.Akhmetov@xxxxxxxxx>
 Dear Alfred, Could you please queue the following motion on P EDCA to the TGbn agenda for voting?:  [M1] Do you agree to define HIP EDCA in UHR where a STA with Low Latency traffic may be allowed, based on TBD conditions, to send a Defer Signal (it is TBD whether CTS or RTS
 is used) to start a protected short contention for pending LL data 
 Supporting doc: 24/1144r1
 SP Result:
150Y, 14N, 70A To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1  To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1  To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |