| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Matt, please see my follow-up inline for 1) and 2). 发件人: Matthew Fischer <matthew.fischer@xxxxxxxxx>
I've created just two small editorial changes to 11-25-0936r8 in response to comments from Chaoming, so no upload of r9 yet. Responses to Chaoming, 1) sequence of 3 vs sequence of 2 The language is subtle, but it does allow a sequence of 2 The language states that a sequence of 3 exists, but the STA only needs to definitively identify the 1st and 3rd and it can assume the existence of the 2nd (or actually receive the 2nd) [cm] My point is: the STA does not need always wait and identify the 3rd. If the STA successfully identifies the 1st
and 2nd, it do not need wait until the 3rd one. 2) either the STA is an AP or a non-AP The phrase that follows non-AP qualifies the non-AP, So this sentence is not just saying "if the STA is an AP or a non-AP" I have added "either" and swapped the order so that it is clear that the conditions are: either A or B I.e. with the presence of "either", one must find "or" before one recognizes that the second condition is being described i.e. all words between "either" and "or" are part of condition A This makes the association of the long qualifier attached to non-AP STA to be unambiguously associated only with the non-AP STA and not the AP [cm] To be honest, I get lost. Do you mean the sentence intends to say “if the
STA is a non-AP STA and transmission of frames that are not a response to a Trigger frame is not disabled by the MU EDCA protocol, the STA may initiate a TXOP …” or “if
the STA is an AP, the STA may initiate a TXOP…” 3) suggesting to change contains 1 to equal to 1 equal to 1 is only used when you are receiving information and testing it in this instance, the STA is transmitting the value no change 4) + 5) ELR and DUO statements - requesting deferral I do not know how many are in favor vs not for these items An SP will provide such information 6) suggestion to move the NOTE on exp backoff agree On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 3:53 AM
罗朝明(Chaoming Luo) <luochaoming@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
--
Matthew Fischer To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |