Hi Alfred,
Thanks for your work. I have bunch of mostly editorial comments for your consideration. Please see attached.
Regarding “initial response”, I suppose we can still call it “initial Control response” and define it as, e.g., “a frame transmitted in response to an initial Control frame (ICF).”
Best regards,
GaiusFrom: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, 9 July 2025 3:10 am
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT on ICF/ICR and CRF for multiple modes
Thanks Mark. Please find inline.
Regards,
Alfred
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 12:06 PM Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Alfred,
I think it should be "initial Control frame" not "Initial Control frame"
(except at the start of a sentence/heading/cell/etc.) or "initial control frame".
[AA] Ack. will apply throughout.
Is "initial response frame" defined somewhere?
[AA] I am not certain. Will double check.
"MU RTS" should be "MU-RTS" throughout.
[AA] Ack.
What are those strange "[2 octets]" etc.?
[AA] Sizes of the fields for the calculation/expectation purposes for UHR.
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
1 Cambridge Square, Cambridge CB4 0AE Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk
From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, 8 July 2025 19:46
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT on ICF/ICR and CRF for multiple modes
Hi Michail,
Thanks for reviewing. Responses attached (updated version of the draft with incorporated changes will come up in the next few days).
Regards,
Alfred
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 11:21 AM Michail Koundourakis <m.koundou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Alfred (and all),
Please see comments in the attached.
Kind regards,
Michail
From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 04 July 2025 01:38
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT on ICF/ICR and CRF for multiple modes
Hi all,
Please find a PDT that aims at bringing clarity on the ICF/ICR and CRF details when multiple modes are enabled:
- https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/25/11-25-1071-00-00bn-pdt-cr-for-icf-icr-details-with-multiple-modes.docx
Since this touches the ICF/ICR of multiple modes I would like to ask for a careful review, especially from the POCs of the respective topics:
- Liwen on DPS and eMLSR
- Laurent on DUO
- Matt on NPCA
- Morteza on DSO
- Po-Kai on CFP (REVmf)
- Mohamed on LLI
- Ming on the CRF (I included some spec text in this doc but I believe it should go in 11-25/0910 so please double check)
PS: ICF/ICRs for MAP related topics are not covered in the above doc.
Thanks in advance for the review and happy 4th of July.
Regards,
Alfred
--
Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD
IEEE802.11 TGbe/TGbn Chair,
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
Cell #: +1 858 263 9445
Office #: +1 858 658 5302
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
--
Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD
IEEE802.11 TGbe/TGbn Chair,
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
Cell #: +1 858 263 9445
Office #: +1 858 658 5302
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
--
Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD
IEEE802.11 TGbe/TGbn Chair,
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
Cell #: +1 858 263 9445
Office #: +1 858 658 5302
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1