| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi P-EDCA TTT members, Thank you for your comments on 25/1950r0 during today’s call. I would like to continue the discussion in this email thread and see the group’s preference on how to address the relevant CIDs. In 11bn D1.2, we have the following text on conditions for a P-EDCA STA to start a P-EDCA contention: A P-EDCA STA may start a P-EDCA contention if all of the following conditions are satisfied: — P-EDCA is enabled by the AP in the BSS and the P-EDCA non-AP STA has
notified the AP of its intent to use P-EDCA on the link. — … To make it more clear, one option would be updating the text as follows: (Option 1) A P-EDCA STA
affiliated with an MLD may start a P-EDCA contention
on the link where the STA is operating in a BSS if all of the following conditions are satisfied: — P-EDCA
has been enabled by the AP in the BSS. — The P-EDCA STA has
enabled P-EDCA with the AP in the BSS
on that link if the P-EDCA STA is a non-AP STA. — … Some explanations:
We could also follow the original style by combining the first and second bullets together: (Option 2) A P-EDCA STA
affiliated with an MLD may start a P-EDCA contention
on the link where the STA is operating in a BSS if all of the following conditions are satisfied: — P-EDCA
has been enabled by the AP in the BSS and the P-EDCA non-AP STA has
enabled P-EDCA with the AP in the BSS
on that link. — … Your feedback and suggestions are welcome. Regards, Zhenpeng To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |