Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] MIB(Annex C) TTT and POC of each feature: Please review 11-26/340 // MLME TTT: Please review 11-26/188

Hi Junpeng,

    Thanks for your comments on the meeting.

    According to the similar design in 11be,  dot11UHROperationEntry is not needed at all and dot11UHRStationConfigEntry could include variable with unsigned32 as well.

    For the dot11AdaptiveOperationModeImplemented, i have same concern on this part.  However, CIDs in 11-26/340r3 are not related with this problem and our TTT group can have further discussion on this part ,try to reach any consenus on this and modify the text in the following MIB part 2 doc even without any related CID.


    I'd like to summarize the problem as below:

    In 11be,  MIB of some features are added in the dot11StationConfigEntry, while others are added in the Dot11EHTStationConfigEntry.  What's the principle for such classification and how to apply to 11bn MIB design?




Best Regards！

Yan Li

Original
From: 娄俊鹏 <loujunpeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: 李炎10200040;
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Date: 2026年03月10日 10:04
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] MIB(Annex C) TTT and POC of each feature: Please review 11-26/340 // MLME TTT: Please review 11-26/188
Hi yan,
Thank you for your efforts on the MIB. I have some questions regarding your contribution in 11-26/340 r3. Due to time constraints during the meeting, I may not have clearly articulated my concerns.

My current focus is on determining the most appropriate placement for certain MIB variables. Specifically, in D1.3, I noticed that some MIB variables (e.g., dot11PEDCARetryThreshold, dot11PEDCAConsecutiveAttempt, etc.) were associated with an operation entry. However, in 340 r3, these variables have been placed under Dot11UHRStationConfigEntry.
Additionally, I observed that dot11AdaptiveOperationModeImplemented has been placed in Dot11StationConfigEntry, rather than being grouped with variables like dot11DUOOptionImplemented in Dot11UHRStationConfigEntry.

This has led to some confusion regarding your interpretation of the roles and distinctions between Dot11UHRStationConfigEntry, Dot11StationConfigEntry,  and dot11OperationEntry(dot11UHROperationEntry). Could you kindly share your thoughts on how these entries should be understood and differentiated?

Best regards,
Junpeng Lou
From: "Yan Li"<li.yan16@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, Mar 7, 2026, 03:21
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] MIB(Annex C) TTT and POC of each feature: Please review 11-26/340 // MLME TTT: Please review 11-26/188
To: <STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Brian,

    The revised doc(11-26/0340r1) is available on the mentor, please check it

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-0340-01-00bn-lb291-cr-for-mib-part-1.docx




Best Regards！

Yan Li


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1

From: BrianHart(brianh) <brianh@xxxxxxxxx>
To: 李炎10200040;stds-802-11-tgbn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <stds-802-11-tgbn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;Binita Gupta (binitag) <binitag@xxxxxxxxx>;
Date: 2026年03月07日 01:33
Subject: RE: MIB(Annex C) TTT and POC of each feature: Please review 11-26/340 // MLME TTT: Please review 11-26/188

Many thanks Yan, this is great work and great progress. My review and proposed updates are attached.

 

Best wishes
Brian

 


Cisco Confidential

From: li.yan16@xxxxxxxxxx <li.yan16@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2026 7:09 PM
To: stds-802-11-tgbn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Brian Hart (brianh) <brianh@xxxxxxxxx>; Binita Gupta (binitag) <binitag@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: MIB(Annex C) TTT and POC of each feature: Please review 11-26/340 // MLME TTT: Please review 11-26/188

 

Hi MIB TTT members and POC for each MAC feature,

    Please review the following document, which may modify the definition of the MIB (dot11XXX) corresponding to the feature you are working on

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-0340-00-00bn-lb291-cr-for-mib-part-1.docx

    

Hi MLME TTT members,

    Please review the following doc, where the SMD information is added in the relevant primitive

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-0188-01-00bn-lb291-cr-for-mlme-part-2.docx

 

 

 

Best Regards！

Yan Li


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1