Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] LB291 CR NPCA EASY revision uploaded now 319r5

Hi Matt, 

Please find below a few comments from my side on your NPCA CR 26/319 (I shared these late last week but I missed including this reflector in my email).
    • CID 12657: can we include that in a more general subclause and consider all similar feature which use critical update
    • CID 12175: this needs to be addressed for all the features
    • CID 4341: NPCA “operating" channel is not defined 
    • CID 6500: need to ensure the CW doesn’t go beyond CWmax — needs to be clarified 
    • CID 10557: move 6.b to ICF/ICR subclause — you can put just a reference here
    • CID 7150: change the language by start with “If NPCA STA does not have …, the it is not allowed …"
    • CID 7153: why it is a “should” not a “shall”
    • CID 6012: probe request from non-AP STA is OK then? What is the argument for only including Probe Response? 
    • CID 4121: do we need a shall requirement here? Can we leave to NPCA STA’s choice? Some details are missing here, like if the NPCA switching happens at the start of R-TWT SP that may need to be clarified if we want to have shall. Resolution for CID 7133 is enough.
    • CID 4459: Isn’t this implementation details? Do we need it here?
    • CID 7133: instead of CID4121, this resolution is sufficient. 

Regards,
Reza

On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 9:12 PM Matthew Fischer <00000959766b2ff5-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
During the regular meeting week 


Matthew Fischer
Nice Guy
Broadcom Inc.
+1 408 543 3370 office

On Fri, Mar 6, 2026, 3:42 PM Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So SP? Or next week?

On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 2:42 PM Matthew Fischer <matthew.fischer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think that everything that is in the doc is reasonable, with no outstanding discussions, but there have been a few changes since the presentation

On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 12:27 PM Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ack. Any set of converged CIDs that we can run SP on?

Regards,

AA

On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 9:04 AM Matthew Fischer <matthew.fischer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Alfred,

Based on comments received during the presentation and received through email, I have revised doc 319 to r5:




--
Matthew Fischer

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1



--
Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD
IEEE802.11 TGbe/TGbn Chair,
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
Cell #:    +1 858 263 9445
Office #: +1 858 658 5302


--
Matthew Fischer


--
Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD
IEEE802.11 TGbe/TGbn Chair,
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
Cell #:    +1 858 263 9445
Office #: +1 858 658 5302

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1