| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Mikhail, Thank you for your work, looks good to me. Some minor question/suggestion: There is a comment (assigned to me) from Alfred regarding NOTE 5 in P-EDCA clause:
“NOTE 5—(#6338)The STA follows the EIFS, CTSTimeout, and NAVTimeout deferral rules before attempting to transmit a DS-CTS to start a P-EDCA contention.” Your text: NOTE 5—(#6338)The STA follows the EIFS, CTSTimeout, and NAVTimeout deferral rules (#5780, #5782, #6457, #11751, #11757, #10258)and may transmit a DS-CTS frame and start a P-EDCA contention
at the P-EDCA slot boundary following the expiration of the corresponding deferral period. I think with your proposed changes also resolve this CID. If so, may be it make sense to move it to your document? What do you think? Dmitry From: Mikhail Liubogoshchev (Nokia) <00003ddff220a80d-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dear P-EDCA TTT, The CR is updated based on the feedback received during the presentation and later offline. This revision aims to be the least restrictive while still addressing the corner cases highlighted in the comments. It also addresses five additional CIDs. I’ll appreciate your feedback. Best regards, Mikhail To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |