| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi all, The following are the CIDs that require further discussion in 11-26/711. If you have comments, please let me know. Best Regards, Liwen CID 6412 Comments received in the meeting: the DBE should be combined with the other methods in one sentence. Justification of using the separate sentences: The reason to separate DE from the other operations in the bullet is that the DBE case is not applicable to “if
different from the DPS non-AP STA’s EHT Capabilities element” that is highlighted. CID 11433 etc. Comments received in the meeting: non-HT duplicate PPDU is missing. The non-HT duplicate PPDU should not be applicable to the band other than 6GHz band.
I can change the text to If there is at least one associated non-AP STA in DPS mode, the UHR AP shall transmit its Beacons and group-addressed frames
as defined in subclause 10.6.5 (Rate selection for Data and Management frames) and 26.17.2.2 (Beacons in the 6 GHz band) with the restrictions of
non-HT (duplicate) PPDU using a rate of 6 Mb/s, 12 Mb/s and 24 Mb/s. (#11433, 4330, 6180, 6527, 8405, 10213) With such changes, the baseline’s non-HT or non-HT duplicate PPDU is followed. CID 11774 Comments received in the meeting: the DPS non-AP STA with ICF Required field set to 0 is ok to enable DUO although the ICF is required for each TXOP the DPS non-AP STA is the TXOP responder. Justification of CID 11774 change in 11-26/711: the EMLSR link should follow the same criteria.
CID 5411 Comments received in the meeting: the current RTS/CTS CCA sensing rules should be applied. Justification of CID 5411 changes in 11-26/711: for a DPS STA with HC mode BW more than 20MHz that uses 20MHz for the CCA in LC mode, the current RTS/CTS rules are not enough. One way moving forward is to
separate the RTS/CTS to case 1 with same BW of LC and HC mode and case 2 with HC mode BW wider than LC mode BW. Case 1 uses the baseline RT/CTS rules while case 2 uses the new rules. CID 11062 Comments received in the meeting: “decoding the PPDUs” is not applicable to ICF Required equal to 0 where the frame transmission is missing. Justification of CID 11062 changes in 11-26/711: the case of ICF Required equal to 1 doesn’t require the transmission of the frame case. One option to move forward is to separate the description to ICF Required equal to 1 from ICF Required equal to 0. To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |