Hi Xiaofei,
Thanks for your question. While an intuitive use case of 147 is in Co-TDMA, I think it can also be used for other MAPC schemes. For example, in Co-SR, AP1 frequently sends a Co-SR Invite frame
to AP2 to share the obtained TXOPs, but AP2 rarely sends an Invite frame back for sharing its obtained TXOP.
Best,
Zhenpeng
From: Xiaofei Wang <00001995ce968e76-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 11:00 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] 11-26/1153 uploaded
Hi Zhenpeng,
Is Reason 147 specifically for Co-TDMA? Or can it be used for other MAPC schemes?
Xiaofei Clement Wang
Principal Engineer | InterDigital
T: (631) 622.4028
From: Shizhenpeng <000039117b12e4ac-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 9:02 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] 11-26/1153 uploaded
Hi all,
26/1153r3 is uploaded based on some offline feedback. Many thanks to your comments and suggestions.
Please review and let me know if you have further comments:
The updated MAPC rejection status codes are as follows:
|
145 |
REJECTED_MAPC_SCHEME_AP_PARAMETERS |
Rejected request due to the setting of at least one MAPC Scheme AP Parameter Set field in the MAPC negotiation request. |
|
146 |
REJECTED_MAPC_AGREEMENT_ LIMIT_EXCEEDED |
Request rejected due to exceeded limit on the maximum number of agreements for a specific MAPC scheme. |
|
147 |
REJECTED_UNFAIR_COORDINATION |
Request rejected because the peer MAPC AP is not coordinating with adequate fairness. |
|
148 |
REJECTED_WITH_SUGGESTED_MAPC_PARAMETERS |
Request rejected due to the presence of at least one MAPC Operation Type field equal to 5 (Alternate) in the MAPC negotiation response. |
Best,
Zhenpeng
From: Shizhenpeng <000039117b12e4ac-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2026 6:29 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] 11-26/1153 uploaded
Hi all,
I have uploaded r2 based on some offline feedback. Please review and let me know if you have any comments, thank you.
The MAPC rejection status codes are updated as follows:
Best,
Zhenpeng
From: Shizhenpeng <000039117b12e4ac-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2026 10:34 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] 11-26/1153 uploaded
Hi all,
I presented 26/1153 today and deferred some CIDs related to
MAPC Status Code. I have made some updates as follows (also can be found in r1) based on the feedback during the call, please let me know if you have any further comments or suggestions. Thanks.
Best,
Zhenpeng
From: Shizhenpeng <000039117b12e4ac-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2026 6:27 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] 11-26/1153 uploaded
Hi Alfred and all,
I have uploaded 26/1153r0 to mentor, it resolves some remaining CIDs on MAPC agreement negotiation:
Best,
Zhenpeng
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1