Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Proposed resolution for Annex B, PICS, posted

Dear Tomo-san,

Thank you.  I agree with you that we do not need this redundancy.

I just uploaded revision 1 that addressed comments from you, Binita, Massinissa, and Xiangxin:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-1283-01-00bn-lb291-comment-resolution-for-pics.docx

Regards,
Edward 




On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 5:16 PM <tomoko.adachi.b99@mail.toshiba> wrote:

 

Hi Edward,

Thank you for this.

Do we need to repeat “CFUHR” where there is for example “CFUHR5G”? Please see such as items CFUHR80 and UHRP2.33.

From my understanding, “CFUHR5G” is “CFUHR”, so “CFUHR AND” part is redundant.

Best regards,

tomo

 

From: Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 6:51 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Proposed resolution for Annex B, PICS, posted

 

Dear Alfred and all,

 

Proposed resolution for Annex B, PICS, is posted:

 

Of note is that it is an 18-page contribution.  Appreciate your time and effort to review and please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions.

 

Regards,

Edward

 

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1