Means the commenter presented new information which requires revisiting the previous approved resolution (i.e., invalidate the earlier “rejected” resolution). The CID/change is not motioned.
From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 8:30 AM
To: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hank Sung (Hyeonjun) <hank.sung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx; Kiseon Ryu <kiseon.ryu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Clarification about Per-STA Profile subelement in the Basic ML element (11-26/1169)
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
Hi @Alfred Asterjadhi @ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx @Kiseon
Ryu,
CID 8376 was resolved in my doc 11-26/1169. I am re-resolving to address the issues identified by Hank.
[AA] I dont know what this means.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:11 PM Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Hank,
Thank you for the discussion and for bring this issue to our attention.
Hi Roaming TTT members,
I have re-resolved CID 8376 in my CR doc 2366:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/25/11-25-2366-11-00bn-lb291-cr-for-cids-assigned-to-abhi-37-16-part-2.docx
The resolution is adding AID field and fields of BSS Max Idle Period to the SMD BSS Transition Parameters element (for ST prep response case).
Could you please review and let me know if you have any suggestions?
Hi @Alfred Asterjadhi @ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx @Kiseon Ryu,
CID 8376 was resolved in my doc 11-26/1169. I am re-resolving to address the issues identified by Hank.
Regards,
Abhi
From: Hank Sung (Hyeonjun) <hank.sung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 1:45 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Clarification about Per-STA Profile subelement in the Basic ML element (11-26/1169)
WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
Hi Abhi and all
Thank you for presenting the contribution 11-26/1169 on June 29.
Looking at the resolution for CID 8376, it states that the MLD-level information of the Target AP MLD can be obtained from the ST Preparation response from the Basic ML element.
However, according to clause 35.3.3.4 (attached below), certain fields and elements do not seem to be included in the STA Profile field of the Basic ML element.
Although the SP has already passed, should we consider having further discussion on this problem?
Can I request to delete the CID 8376 in motion list?
Best Regards,
Hank
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
--
Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD
IEEE802.11 TGbe/TGbn Chair,
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
Cell #: +1 858 263 9445
Office #: +1 858 658 5302
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1