Hi Alfred,
Thanks – found it.
Again, thanks a lot for the team. All of this takes lot of energy for almost an year and I appreciate it! So please do not think I am nitpicking!
Is there a reason the resolution document is not included into the “Ballot Details” (it says NA). Could this be added? I assume that the Redline version would also be added as it is available.
Thanks.
Regards,
srini
From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2026 2:29 PM
To: Srini Kandala <srini.k1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] P802.11bn Draft D2.0 Now Available
Hi Srini, That doc can be found under Other documents. Regards, Alfred On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 2: 24 PM Srini Kandala <srini. k1@ samsung. com> wrote: Hi Alfred,
Looking at .11mf draft 3. 0, I think the convention is also to put the CIDs next
|
This Message Is From an External Sender
|
|
Use caution opening files, clicking links or responding to requests.
|
|
|
Hi Srini,
That doc can be found under Other documents.
Hi Alfred,
Looking at .11mf draft 3.0, I think the convention is also to put the CIDs next to the changes even in the clean version. It would have helped if we had these references. Can we
also have a clean version with references to the CID that effected the changes?
Thanks.
Regards,
srini
Hi Sigurd, Yes, we will announce, when redline 2. 0 compared to 1. 0 is available in the members area, with a separate email in the next
day or so. Regards, Alfred On Mon, Aug 3, 2026, 12: 31 PM Sigurd Schelstraete <0000147fea1cee5c-dmarc-request@ listserv. ieee. org>
|
This Message Is From an External Sender
|
|
Use caution opening files, clicking links or responding to requests.
|
|
|
Hi Sigurd,
Yes, we will announce, when redline 2.0 compared to 1.0 is available in the members area, with a separate email in the next day or so.
Hi Alfred, Ross,
For major draft revisions (e.g. D2.0) we usually get a redline version relative to the immediately preceding draft (D1.5 in this case) and the last major revision (D1.0). In this
case, I only see a revision relative to D1.5.
Not to put an undue burden on the editor but is it possible to have a revision relative to D1.0 as well?
Thanks,
Sigurd
This email was sent from outside of MaxLinear.
Hello all,
P802.11bn Draft D2.0 is now available in the members area:
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/private/Draft_Standards/11bn/index.html
Many thanks to our editor, Ross, for working around the clock to ensure timely delivery of the draft.
Also, if you are in the list of
voters, please consider voting on the working group letter ballot LB296. Instructions can be found
here.
Regards,
Alfred
--
Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD
IEEE802.11 Vice Chair/TGbn Chair,
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
|