| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Binita,
I had a discussion with Pooya and he pointed out the issue with the text that you and I agreed on.
The paragraph in question covers the case where an AP is reporting a colocated AP that is
not operating on the same channel. Here, when the reporting AP is a TxBSSID, then it is required (per 11be MLO rules) to also report partner link of each nonTxBSSID in the set. This is the 2nd (main) bullet in that paragraph.
I have updated my resolution as follows. The figure in annex AA (Figure AA-8) greatly helps with the understanding.
![]()
@Binita Gupta (binitag) @Pooya Monajemi Please let me know
if you have any suggestions.
Hi all, please review and let me know if you have any feedback:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-1746-08-00bn-lb296-mac-cr-for-cids-assigned-to-abhi-37-16-part-1.docx
Hi
@Alfred Asterjadhi, can you please help q this CID for SP?
Regards,
Abhi
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |