| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Leif, Thanks for the information. I will make the change to 2.4GHz text as suggested. For S1G, looks like there are different interpretations of the motion text.
@lipanpan (D), do you want to bring another SP/motion to clarify your intention? or I can leave out S1G waveform text for now. Thanks, Rui From: Leif Wilhelmsson R <leif.r.wilhelmsson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Rui, The way I recall the discussion related to motion #94 is that it originally said CW, but when Joerg asked if the intention really was to have a carrier wave the answer was that the intention was to say that it
should be single carrier (and not OFDM), and therefore the SP was changed to single carrier. I believe the spec text therefore should read as the passed motion. A minor editorial thing. In 40.3.3.1, I suggest writing
. The base OFDM symbol is generated by performing 64-point IFFT of TBD
non-zero tones Instead of
The base OFDM symbol is generated by performing 64-point IFFT of TBD
loaded tones BR, Leif To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1 |