Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBP] Straw Poll

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hello, Yaron,

Please kindly clarify the reference documents to suppor this SP, and clarify whether you are requesting a new SFD MAC SP, or to bring back a deferred SP? In either case, I will add this SP to the end of the pending SP queue. it's possible that there's no enough time for any new SP in TC on Apr 14, depending on the progress of current pending SPs, in which case the new MAC SPs will be postponed to following TCs.

Thanks for your understanding!

Best Regards,

Original

From: YaronBenArie(TRC) <000045ab29af2485-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To: STDS-802-11-TGBP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;

Date: 2026年04月12日 16:27

Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBP] Straw Poll

Hello Bo

Can you pls add my SP to Apr 14^th meeting ?

The text has been modified according to inputs that I got from team members.

The TGbp SFD will support the non-AP AMP Active Transmitter STAs transmitting a measurement report containing the charge rate or RSSI measured during energizing;
The measurement report to be sent is TBD.

Explanation:

This SP is primarily for enabling location in a multi-energizer AMP system.

Both charge rate and RSSI can serve this purpose (charge rate is actually one form of RSSI).

The absolute measurement accuracy is not critical – but rather the difference between energizers, as they are received by the STA.
These differences enable the AP to locate the STA.

Using RSSI is fast but requires an ADC (3-5 bits) – however, if the STA supports energy status report (Ian’s motion) the STA already has it.

Using Charge Rate requires ~5 bits counter driven by 1Mhz clock or so – and doesn’t need an ADC.

I’m OK with both implementation methods.

Thanks

Yaron

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1