Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBP] PDT SPs



Alice, 

I think Yinan can advise on this, but it would be better to separate the waveform generation in 2.4 GHz from that in S1G. I propose to simply change the ON-WG, OFF-WG to something that differs from 40.4.3.

Cheers, 
Nelson.

On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 5:23 AM Alice Jialing Li Chen <jialing.li.phd2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Ian,

Your first comment to 11-26/781 has been addressed. r1 has been uploaded after the presentation and discussion.

In general, agree to your second comment on the ON-WG and OFF-WG. The structure of spec subclauses depends on our editor and the PoCs of these subclauses. The ON-WG and OFF-WG have been described in 40.4.3 for sub-1 GHz. I'm not sure about the plan of the PoC of the Tx block diagram of 2.4 GHz. I'll keep my PDT as is.

Regards,
Alice


On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 12:50 AM Ian Bajaj <ian@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Alice,
Regarding 11-26/0781r1, I do not see a r1 on the server. In any case, there is a minor typo on the second line after Eqn 40-A, that may require a r1.
image.png

Regarding 11-26/0732r1, I understand trying to maintain similar content for 2.4GHz and Sub-1GHz, but there may need to be a common 40.X section to include the definition of On-WG, Off-WG, Fig 40-19 (AMP signal generator) for both  2.4GHz and Sub-1GHz, or alternatively you may have to repeat the definitions and description in your subclause, as it appears before 40.4.3 with no reference to these terms.
Additionally, I believe the definition of the waveform generator would be different for 2.4GHz, as the base waveform is different. 

Kind regards
Ian

On Fri, May 8, 2026 at 12:01 AM Alice Jialing Li Chen <jialing.li.phd2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Bo,

Could you please add the following two PDT SPs for the two PDTs I presented in past TGbp calls? Feel free to combine them into one SP if you think it is more appropriate and efficient.

SP1 is related to the newly uploaded 11-26/0732r1 (PDT of overview of encoding process). The only change in r1 was changing "WUR" to "WUP".

SP2 is related to the PDT of AMP PLME. It was presented in the call on 5/6. We'll have the Q&A in the next call. r1 is not yet uploaded and I will wait for more feedback and the Q&A to finalize r1 before the SP is run.

 

PDT SP 1

Do you agree to incorporate the proposed text changes in document 11-26/0732r1 into the next version of the IEEE 802.11bp draft, and grant the editor privilege to make editorial modification when incorporating the proposed text?

 

PDT SP 2

Do you agree to incorporate the proposed text changes in document 11-26/0781r1 into the next version of the IEEE 802.11bp draft, and grant the editor privilege to make editorial modification when incorporating the proposed text?


Thanks,

Alice
Qualcomm



On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 9:19 AM Alice Jialing Li Chen <jialing.li.phd2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Bo,

Could you please add the following two PDT SPs for the two PDTs I presented in today's TGbp call? Feel free to combine them into one SP if you think it is more appropriate and efficient.

 

PDT SP 1

Do you agree to incorporate the proposed text changes in document 11-26/0705r2 into the next version of the IEEE 802.11bp draft, and grant the editor privilege to make editorial modification when incorporating the proposed text?

 

PDT SP 2

Do you agree to incorporate the proposed text changes in document 11-26/0706r0 into the next version of the IEEE 802.11bp draft, and grant the editor privilege to make editorial modification when incorporating the proposed text?


Thanks,

Alice
Qualcomm

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1