Hi Xiangxin,
Thanks for preparing the SP.
My comment was the SP that you ran is already been covered via M73.
Based on the passed M73, IMMW STAs are already allowed to negotiate on-demand SP via IMMW link. Of course we haven’t decided yet method of negotiation, but the case of on-demand SP extension is already been covered.
Here’s example:
Within on-going SP, in case of negotiation is completely done by setting the start time of the on-demand SP that is equal to or later than the end time of the on-going SP, then this exactly on-demand SP extension what you just mentioned.
Thanks,
Dongju
From: Gu Xiangxin <xiangxin.gu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2026 1:16 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBQ] Collect feedback for service period extension on mmWave link.
Hi 11bqer,
I run the SP of document 26/1117r0 in AM 1 session today. Many members support the SP. Thanks.
During the discussion, some people think that the SP has been covered by motion 73 so the SP is not needed.
Would you please reply this email to let me know which case is there?
- the SP has been covered so is not needed.
- the SP is not good and your concerns.
Xiangxin Gu
Institute of Communication Technology
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBQ list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBQ&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBQ list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBQ&A=1