| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Jianhan, Thank you for the question. Let me describe it more accurately.
The transmitter starts CCA in advance to make sure
to send NDPs before the start time or at the start time. The CCA shall be failed at the start time (channel is busy before the CCA backoff duration expires.). In this case, I prefer to cancel the BE to avoid complexity. I think we have time to make the solution more mature. From: Jianhan Liu <Jianhan.Liu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Xiangxin, I think there are enough discussions on this topic, and we should make progress this time.
Your proposal to start CCA in advance to guarantee the transmission at the fixed start time seems not valid. The time duration of channel “BUSY” is random, start CCA in advance cannot guarantee
the channel becomes “idle” at the start time. Your Extra NDP ideas have nothing to do with the motions, we can discuss on your idea in the following sessions.
Hopefully, we can make some progress in this meeting. Thanks, Jianhan From:
顾祥新 (Xiangxin Gu) <000046f9987a2d10-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi 11bqer, During the AM2 session yesterday, there are several contributions and proposals addressing the issue. Here I propose a simpler solution, for discussion.
The following is the illustration of the method. (I also upload a document
26/1860 to the mentor on this. )
Could the motions related on this topic be deferred to leave time for further discussion ? BR, Xiangxin Gu Institute of Communication Technology To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBQ list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBQ&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBQ list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBQ&A=1 |