[STDS-802-11-TGBR] AW: Comments on 11-26/0451-00 (TGbr Telco) [Minor correction]
Dear all,
Adding to this, here are my comments.
Best regards - Volker
Slide 3
- Integration of AI with Wi-Fi
o Industrial use case: Mobile (humanoid) robots, need for sensing the environment through cameras (2D), lidars (3D) high-speed uplink is only needed locally where a lot of data are generated (crossing, nearby other robots)
Slide 4
- may be simplified, go over it in shorter time
- Go from backwards-looking operation (bb: HT,VHT, HE) (br: adds EHT but no bX) towards fully integrated solution (bX: new PHY also supported via light being a transparent medium)
- Make optical communication part of the mainstream
Slide 6
- consider recent updates in Europe
Slide 8
- remove the fading figure as it applies to RF and leaves people with the wrong message
Slide 9
- use light access point left figure
- middle picture is not yet self-explaining
- use the word imaging transmitter and receiver
Slide 10
- Have only one DSP chip with RF- and optical frontends connected
- MLO: maybe differentiated w.r.t. standalone vs. non-standalone
- TGbr might be able to add ELC as standalone
- non-standalone operation needs closer interaction with the working group
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Aravindh Krishnamoorthy <00004c930240d8fe-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Februar 2026 12:44
An: STDS-802-11-TGBR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBR] Comments on 11-26/0451-00 (TGbr Telco) [Minor correction]
Please note the minor correction of "non-emission-nature" to "no-RF-emission-nature" below. Sorry for this -- ark
-----Original Message-----
From: Aravindh Krishnamoorthy <00004c930240d8fe-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 17 February 2026 11:41
To: STDS-802-11-TGBR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBR] Comments on 11-26/0451-00 (TGbr Telco)
Dear Mohammad,
Thank you for the excellent proposal in 11-26/0451-00 [1] towards RF and LiFi integrated devices. As you're aware, this aligns very well to my thoughts and objectives in [2].
I'm sorry I had to leave at 10:30am UK time for another appointment. I will look forward to the minutes.
My comments are as follows:
1. I am very happy to note that the proposal brings out the no-RF-emission-nature of ELC, which is especially pertinent for reuse of 6 GHz chips across geographies for ELC, and to highlight the differences to the work of TGbq.
2. Perhaps it would be interesting to add to Slide 9 a point on LC/ELC/XLC-based ranging and sensing.
3. It may be interesting to check if parts of the proposal can be covered already under ELC. The work needed to enable this use case at a basic level might not be much, please also see [2] for some initial ideas. We can discuss more on this, if interesting.
4. It might be beneficial to include some details on the system proposal in Slide 10. As it stands, the proposal is likely too vague and leaves a lot of details/interpretations wide open.
Best regards,
Aravindh Krishnamoorthy
[1]: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-0451-00-00br-use-of-light-communication-beyond-11bn.pptx
[2]: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/25/11-25-1648-01-00br-elc-mld-mapping-proposal.pptx
________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBR list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBR&A=1
________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBR list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBR&A=1
________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBR list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBR&A=1