Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBT] 2026/4r0 PQC PAKE design in details

[Jay Yang <yang.zhijie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Dan,

Thanks for the high level guidance on SAE from inventor respectively. I will remove the relevant the proposed text to address your security concern.

BTW, Could you provide some evidence to show the proposed text to address side channel attack accepted by IETF CFRG ?  I will double confirm internally first, and then incorporate them into my PDT per your suggestion.

Please continue to help offline review it. And welcome your further comments and suggestion.

Thanks

Best Regards

Jay Yang (杨志杰)

Original

From: Harkins,Dan <00003862fd143b8a-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To: STDS-802-11-TGBT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;

Date: 2026年01月15日 05:48

Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBT] 2026/4r0 PQC PAKE design in details

 

  Hi Jiawei ,

 

> > 2. 

>> SAE  has been widely used for many years, it will simple for the implementation and maintenance if we could upgrade  it to support PQC with minor change. 

> 

> I agree. However, this is an untrivial task. I have serious doubt about the if... part.

 

  Agree. My doubt about the if part is 100%. And I say that as the person who invented SAE in the first place.

 

  Regards,

 

  Dan.

 

--

“the object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to

escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBT list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBT&A=1

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBT list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBT&A=1