Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBT] Liaison to IETF on support for draft-ietf-tls-mlkem



 

  <insert thumbs up emoji>

 

--

“the object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to

escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

 

 

From: "Stacey, Robert" <robert.stacey@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "Stacey, Robert" <robert.stacey@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 at 12:13 PM
To: "STDS-802-11-TGBT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <STDS-802-11-TGBT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBT] Liaison to IETF on support for draft-ietf-tls-mlkem

 

Hello Dan,

 

I am OK with:

“We would further request that the IETF look at updating EAP-TLS once draft-ietf-tls-mlkem is published as this is one of the mechanisms which that IEEE P802.11bt will use.”

 

-Robert

 


From: Peter Yee <peter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 12:05 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBT] Liaison to IETF on support for draft-ietf-tls-mlkem

 

Dan,

 

                In fact, the EMU WG does have one proposal for an updated EAP-TLS (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-reddy-emu-pqc-eap-tls/). That is, of course, a personal Internet-Draft and has not yet been adopted by the EMU WG. It’s also possible that some other approach will be taken for updating EAP-TLS.

 

                                Kind regards,

                                -Peter

 

On 3/11/26, 11:38AM, "Harkins, Dan" <00003862fd143b8a-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

 

  Hi Robert,

 

  It says, “We would further request that the IETF look at updating EAP-TLS once draft-ietf-tls-mlkem is published as this is the mechanism through which IEEE P802.11bt will use this work.” It is not “the mechanism”, it is “one of the mechanisms”. Also, “this is the mechanism…use this work” is a bit confusing. How about:

 

“We would further request that the IETF look at updating EAP-TLS once draft-ietf-tls-mlkem is published as this is one of the mechanisms which IEEE P802.11bt will use.”

 

  We should also ask the IETF IEEE Liaison Officer about this seeing as he is the co-chair of the EAP Methods Update (EMU) working group of the IETF that will be doing the work 😊

 

  Regards,

 

  Dan.

 

--

“the object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to

escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

 

 

From: "Stacey, Robert" <robert.stacey@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "Stacey, Robert" <robert.stacey@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 at 11:26 AM
To: "STDS-802-11-TGBT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <STDS-802-11-TGBT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBT] Liaison to IETF on support for draft-ietf-tls-mlkem

 

Hello Stephen,

 

I have uploaded a draft liaison to the IETF on support for the publication of draft-ietf-tls-mlkem as an RFC.

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-0666-00-00bt-liaison-to-ietf-support-for-draft-ietf-tls-mlkem.docx

 

I would appreciate it if we could review this at the Thursday AM2 TGbt meeting. I would like the group to consider a motion to approve this (or a variant based on further discussion).

 

Regards,

-Robert 


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBT list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBT&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBT list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBT&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBT list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBT&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBT list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBT&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBT list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBT&A=1