Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBT] Request for Strawpoll in TGbt PM1 (July 13th)


  Good idea for a straw poll but can we gauge the feeling of the group with a little wider of a question? How about:

  DP: Which option would you support to address the issue of element fragmentation in draft 0.3:
  1. Extended-Length elements (11-26/1265r2)
  2. Use of fields instead of elements (11-26/1163r4)
  3. Nothing, keep element fragmentation for PQC 802.1X 

  Regards,

  Dan.

--
“the object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
On 7/13/26, 10:55 AM, "Anirban Karmakar (akarmaka)" <00005e809b46533a-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Stephen,

I would like to request this straw poll in the TGbt PM1 session, to ask the group for its opinion on he following.


SP Text:

Do you support requesting the Working Group to allocate one of the values currently marked as reserved in Table 9-164 for use as the Element ID that identifies an Extended-Length Element?


thanks
Anirban

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBT list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBT&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBT list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBT&A=1