Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Discussion for CID 221 and 222

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hello,

25/2325 CR for CID 221 and 222 has been uploaded with the resolution mentioned in the previous email.
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/25/11-25-2325-00-000m-lb289-cr-for-cid-221-and-222.docx

Any comment is welcomed,
BRs,

Haorui Yang (Rae)

China Mobile
---- Replied Message ----
From Haorui Yang (Rae)<yanghaorui0217@xxxxxxx>
Date 11/18/2025 11:32
To <STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject [STDS-802-11-TGM] Discussion for CID 221 and 222
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hello all,

This email is to trigger the discussion on how to resolve CID 221 and 222.

Based on the comment in the Sep. Ad-hoc minutes, there is a proposal to add the MPDU delimiter check to the general MPDU reception check at P666.50 in 9.2.2. Although this comment is kind of outside the scope of what the CIDs want to resolve, I am glad to have the discussion and also change the spec by these CIDs based on the consensus. 

After I re-read the spec, it seems that the 9.2.2 is applied to the MPDU reception, instead of A-MPDU whose reception check is mentioned in the context on how to fill the ack context. 

Therefore, how about not touching 9.2.2 and only adding the missing MPDU delimiter subfield check to P4355.25 and P 4358.15?

Any comment is welcomed.
BRs,

Haorui Yang(Rae)

China Mobile

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1