G’day all
Some updates on activities in IEEE 802.11 PDED next week
·
We will be hearing a presentation on simulations that I understand show accepting 3GPP’s request of an ED of -72dBm is not a great idea
o
The document will be uploaded towards the end of the week
·
A draft of a proposed LS to 3GPP RAN1 in relation to PDED issue is in development as agreed at the last teleconference
o
The draft will be uploaded towards the end of the week
·
The IEEE 802.11 Chair has asked the IEEE 802 PDED ad hoc to consider a response to 3GPP RAN1’s LS
16-11-1343
o
My intuition is either we should:
§
Do nothing
§
Send a response highlighting the important of closing these issues before Rel 13 is completed and encouraging 3GPP RAN1 to send up proposals for closing them ASAP
o
Other views are invited
o
Note: the
original LS was from IEEE 802 and developed in IEEE 802.19
Andrew
From: *** IEEE
stds-802-11 List *** [mailto:STDS-802-11@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Myles (amyles)
Sent: Monday, 31 October 2016 5:49 PM
To: STDS-802-11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11] IEEE 802 PDED ad hoc: call for agenda items
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---
G’day all
Next week there are two sessions of the IEEE 802.11 PDED ad hoc planned, based on the (very) draft agenda
11-16-1345-01
·
Tuesday AM2
·
Thursday PM1
The current direction of the ad hoc, based on the results of the three teleconferences, is to write and approve a liaison back to 3GPP RAN1 that states:
·
Their request is noted
·
IEEE 802 reiterates its position that LAA adopting 802.11 PD and reservation signalling (e.g. CTS-to-self) is the best solution for coexistence in the 5 GHz band
·
IEEE 802 and 3GPP may continue to study, communicate and collaborate towards optimizing coexistence between their respective technologies in the 5 GHz band
Would anyone like to make a case for an alternative direction? If so, please notify me and upload a presentation.
Would anyone like to suggest a way of gathering more evidence for this direction, maybe based on slides 21-28 of
11-16-1291-00? More evidence would be more compelling, noting that 3GPP RAN1 has rejected the basis of IEEE 802’s previous similar stances. If so, please notify me and upload a presentation.
At the last teleconference Thomas Derham committed to putting together a draft liaison to 3GPP RAN1 (with my assistance). Thomas, when do you think that draft will be ready?
Andrew
|
|
||
|
Andrew Myles |
Cisco Systems Limited |
|
_______________________________________________________________________________
If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect.
Instead, go to
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11 and then press the LEAVE button.
If there is no LEAVE button here, try
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-RO.
Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________
If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect.
Instead, go to http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11 and then press the LEAVE button.
If there is no LEAVE button here, try http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-RO.
Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________