| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Brian and Roshini, I have a question for resolved comments, comment #8 and
comment #120 in 80216m-07_041r3.cmt. (Both are accept-modified.) In comment #8, the second part of resolution is Part 2: Leave Urban macrocell site-to-site
distance, channel model and propagation model unchanged. Mobility mix is 3
km/hr – 60%, 30 km/hr – 30%, 120 km/hr – 10%. 19 in favor 9 against And in comment #120L, the resolution of this comment is Adopt the baseline configuration as the only
mandatory test scenario. Replace the following text "For purposes of
FDD system evaluation, a TBD test scenario shall be used. Proponents are
required to present performance results for both mandatory test scenarios
defined in Table 3." By "SRD Requirements must be met for TDD and
FDD. Proponents are required to present performance results for the baseline
configuration as defined in Table 3. Case 1: Baseline Configuration, uncorrelated
antennas at both BS and MS Case 2: Baseline Configuration, uncorrelated
antennas at MS, correlated antennas at BS (Section 3.2.9)" Change Urban macrocell model to Optional. Mark section 3.2.9 as mandatory. I think these
two comment resolutions are contradictory, since the first one clearly says “leave Urban macrocell”, which is Mandatory for Urban macrocell, and the second
one says “change Urban macrocell model to Optional”. The first one
(comment #8) resolved first, and the other (comment #120) was submitted and
resolved the day after the first one resolved. After the
first comment resolved, I think that the TG should resolve the late
comments as "superceded" or make a motion as "re-open
the first comment". I am confused
what the final resolution of these two comments is. Best Regards, Wookbong Lee |