Re: [RPRWG] IPoRPR draft revision
David,
I fixed all the editorials you sent on the previous draft -- except the
ones that were part of the IETF style...
But send your comments to the IEEE list and I can include them in the
set of comments I take as input from IEEE.
Cheers,
Glenn.
-----Original Message-----
From: David V James [mailto:dvj@ALUM.MIT.EDU]
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 9:56 PM
To: STDS-802-17@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [RPRWG] IPoRPR draft revision
Glen,
There are a fair number of editing mistakes.
I'm willing to supply comments, but not willing to join another mailing
list.
Could you or someone else provide a conduit for comments? Should I send
them to this reflector first?
DVJ
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Glenn Parsons [mailto:gparsons@NORTEL.COM]
>> Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 5:34 PM
>> To: STDS-802-17@listserv.ieee.org
>> Subject: [RPRWG] IPoRPR draft revision
>>
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> An updated draft of the IPoRPR basic mapping is attached. The
>> changes are mostly editorial based on comments from IEEE 802.17. The
>> most significant changes are to the RPR nomenclature in Tables 2 & 3.
>>
>> This version will not be in the Internet Draft archives until after
>> the IETF meeting.
>>
>> Also, note that the primary review mechanism is to submit comments to
>> the IETF IPoRPR mailing list -- and you must be a member to post (and
>> get past the spam filter :-).
>>
>> There is currently no plan for an IPoRPR WG meeting at IETF 64 in
>> Vancouver.
>>
>> However, there is agenda time at the IEEE 802.17 meeting in Vancouver
>> next week to discuss this draft.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Glenn
>>
>> PS. The drafts are posted here as well:
>> http://standards.nortel.com/iporpr
>>