| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dan,
Thanks for your
message.
It is true that 802.20's
Coexistence Task Group (CTG) does not have to produce minimum equipment performance data. But it will certainly need that
information to run simulations necessary for making meaningful recommendations
and guidelines for coexistence. So, CTG either have to be given the task of
producing that data or be given that data produced by whatever entity that
will produce it.
As for 802.16-REVd, it will be a combination of 802.16 (above 10 GHz), 802.16a (2-10 GHz), and 802.16c (system profiles for >10 GHz). The first two certainly do not include minimum performance data. The system profiles document is supposed to have the minimum performance data but leaves such things as spectral mask and spurious emissions to "local regulation" and doesn't specify any number. So, none of these include what you can find in section 5.5 of 802.16.2-REVa (the coexistence document) which applies to >10 GHz PMP systems (the 2-11 GHz part does not include such section on Equipment Design Parameters). So, while I think 802.16 does not provide a good model for handling minimum performance requirements, I certainly believe that CTG needs those requirements to produce meaningful results. Bottom line, I think the CTG,
once formed, should decide on whether they want to take the burden of producing
minimum performance data or just ask for it to be provided to them by the rest
of the WG, and reflect this in the PAR they will write.
Regards,
Reza
|