RE: contributions for upcoming May 2004 meeting - ARID
Steve, clear enough..:-)
- Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
- Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sungjin Lee [mailto:steve.lee@samsung.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 12:04 PM
> To: 'S. Daniel Park'; 'McCann, Stephen'; 'stds-802-21'
> Cc: ajayrajkumar@LUCENT.COM; 'Pyungsoo Kim'
> Subject: RE: contributions for upcoming May 2004 meeting - ARID
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I just addressed my comment in last mail on your question referring
> Stephen's comment.
> I would like to ask what you exactly mean by 'agreement' from
> other WGs. I
> am wondering if it is possible to change 802.11 or 16 message
> within 802.21
> even if we got a sort of agreement from other WG.
> The upper layer solution and element (e.g. ARID format) could
> be discussed
> within 802.21 and release 'recommendation' document, but the
> way to adapt
> that solution and specific message changes could not discussed within
> 802.21. In ARID case, you can contribute ARID in L2 message
> concept to
> 802.21 and the operational scenarios and element format can
> be discussed
> within 802.21 as the generic model to standardize, and 802.11
> case can be
> addressed as the example scenario in 802.21.
> However, if you want to contribute ARID in specific 802.11
> Beacon message,
> you should contribute it to 802.11 WIEN SG.
>
> now clear ? :)
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Sungjin Lee
> =====================================
> Global Standards & Research Team
> Telecommunication R&D Center
> Samsung Electronics
>
> TEL : +82 31 279 5248
> FAX : +82 31 279 5130
> MOBILE : +82 16 301 6603
> E-mail : steve.lee@samsung.com
> ======================================
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
> [mailto:owner-stds-802-21@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of S.
> Daniel Park
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:13 AM
> To: steve.lee@SAMSUNG.COM; 'McCann, Stephen'; 'stds-802-21'
> Cc: ajayrajkumar@LUCENT.COM; 'Pyungsoo Kim'
> Subject: RE: contributions for upcoming May 2004 meeting - ARID
>
> Steve, please see my inline comments.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sungjin Lee [mailto:steve.lee@samsung.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 9:48 AM
> > To: 'S. Daniel Park'; 'McCann, Stephen'; 'stds-802-21'
> > Cc: ajayrajkumar@LUCENT.COM; 'Pyungsoo Kim'
> > Subject: RE: contributions for upcoming May 2004 meeting - ARID
> >
> >
> > Hi Daniel, Stephen and all HO guys
> >
> > In my understanding, that kind of issue (e.g. ARID into
> > beacon) is fit to be discussed within 802.21. The ARID formant,
> > recommended usage examples and scenarios also could be
> discussed and
> > then put into the documentation released as 802.21 spec. based on
> > agreement between 802.21 attendees.
> >
> > However, the specific way to provide that ARID information over the
> > air interface should be discussed within each WG. In fact,
> It sould be
> > discussed within 802.11 WG to propose the changed Beacon frame
> > structure including ARID and within
> > 802.16 to propose the changed DL-MAP or NBR-ADV message including
> > ARID.
>
> It was my original question, so I guess this work is useful
> for related WG
> such as 802.11, 802.16 but the contribution should be discussed in the
> 80.21, of course we have to get the agreement of 802.11 to
> insert ARID into
> the beacon.
> Of course we have to get the agreement of 802.16 if ARID
> would be applied
> for 802.16.
>
> correct ? or am I missing anything ?
>
> I am not sure how I can get the agreement of 802.11 to insert
> ARID into the
> beacon. Do I have to propose it to the
> 802.11 as a document ? or 802.21 can be responsible for this
> collaboration.
> I am so curious...
>
>
> Regards.
>
> - Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
> - Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.
>