| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Reijo, That sounds great! Hopefully this is something which can be (needs to be) done mostly independently and is not really tied to down selection and evaluation criteria. Best Regards -Vivek |-----Original Message----- |From: owner-stds-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802- |21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Reijo Salminen |Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 2:16 AM |To: 'Nada Golmie'; STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG |Subject: RE: Conference Call Reminder: ad hoc group on evaluation -January |11, 2005 10am-12 noon EST | |Hello, | |Regarding the usage scenarios update, I've gathered information about the |standardization activities details in different SDO:s, related |alliances/forums, interoperability/conformance related |organizations/activities, and standards interpretation questions, to list |some examples. This is needed as background information for 802.21 to |produce a well balanced standard, that provides enough flexibility for the |vendors to 'add value', and yet is strict enough to facilitate |interoperability of the basic functionality - and then continue with the |usage scenarios to gain confidence on the proposed mechanisms. | |I will present the findings in the form of a submission in the interim, it |is quite a big area, and is probably better to discuss about on a |face-to-face meeting. | |BR, Reijo