Hi Vivek and Stefano,
   
  [Vivek G Gupta]
Many of the existing media specific technologies 
  already do this in some form. For example 802.11k provides access to link 
  layer measurements like Bit Rate, BER, etc. that you mention above. Other 
  media specific technologies also have a provision for something 
  similar.
Given that, do we need any additional methods/primitives or 
  capabilities from 802.21 for above?
[[Stefano] ]  I 
  think the answer is completely depending on the use scenarios. Let's assume a 
  3GPP network operator owns multiple accesses, such as 802.11 and 802.16 in 
  addition to the 3GPP specific access networks. Let's assume the operator is 
  interested in having network controlled HO e.g. for load sharing or other 
  reasons that require stricter control that the one granted by simply 
  controlling the policies in the terminal used to decide HO between 
  technologies. In such case, it may be difficult in practical implementations 
  to have an MME function in the network that relies on existing L2 
  technology-specific to collect the information. it pretty much implies a tight 
  IW of the various radio interfaces/ANs at L2, that may not be that easy to 
  implement nor that acceptable to 3GPP operators/vendors. In such scenario, 
  using 802.21 at "L3 and above" to allow reporting of information to the MIHF 
  in an MME that is used to control inter-technology HO may be an easy and clean 
  way to!
  go. I see this as a very relevant scenario for "L3 and 
  above" MIH.
  => 
  [Junghoon] 
  I tend to agree about the scenario that Stefano mentioned as 
  a general application of MIH.
  However, I have some concern regarding the network-initiated 
  inter-technology handover.
  To support not one or two mobile terminals, overloading of MIH 
  _handover_ control entity by enormous MIH events and commands...
  IMO, it would be better to let a mobile terminal have a 
  brain about inter-technology handover decision.