| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Peretz, This seems to be largely a tool issue…. Most of the columns in different comments
are offset w.r.t each other in the merged Comments file , so that section
numbers, pages etc. across all comments are not well aligned in the merged
Comments file. That leads to a lot of confusion. Also in many cases the
comments are addressed more adequately through the supporting contributions. Would have been better to include an
example (sample) of Comments file with some instructions for 802.21 members who
have not been attending 802.16 and are using this for the first time. I know many
802.21 members have spent quite a bit of time in just getting used to the tool
and in submitting comments as best as they can. Best Regards -Vivek From: stds-802-21@ieee.org
[mailto:stds-802-21@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Peretz
Feder Dear 802.21 members:As I can't make this upcoming meeting in with your contributions through the commentary file.In contrast to the 802.16 commentary methodology, many of your comments are hardto decipher and probably stem from the first attempt to use this commentary tool.Please try to use commentary as a specific replacement tool to exiting text oras a mechanism for adding text to various sections within the draft. Many of thecomments I list below are impossible to follow and miss to communicate themessage. Please try to follow the format I used for comments 147-159. Pleasespecify exactly the section(s), page(s) and lines effected. Please strike out(in red like Ronny did) the removed text and add in (Red) the differential new text.Also my tool reads many empty comments (listed below). I wonder if it is anexporting issue when trying to combine.Eric: What is comment 9? what section?Eric Comments 8, 10, 11, 12, 13: have no remedy, these are only open statementsEric comment 14: are you referring to Network Selection? Please specify originaltextEric comment 15: what is the original text you are referring to?Eric comment 18: and 19? what is the remedy?Eric comment 21: too open endedEric: comment 22: what should be taken out?Eric comment 23, 24: "This" this what?Eric comment 25: what is not true? please list the original text you areobjection toEric comment 28, 30: It will be better to show the original text, strike outthe unwanted section and retype the new text insteadEric comment 31: Replace what?Eric comment 32, 34, 35, 47, 58, 59, 72, 74, 75: - empty comments as read by mycommentary toolEric comment 37,38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 55, 57, 60,61, 62, 63, 64, 69, 70, 71: all open ended, w/o remedy or proposed changesEric comment 45, 46, 54: Remedy = original text? I don't see your point hereEric comment 56: Are you referring to one of the tables?Eric comment 65, 66: Which table?Eric comment 67, 73: Specific remedy?Eric comment 76, 77: no remedySubir comment 78: Remedy = 6.3.1? Need to be more specific show old and new textpleaseSubir comment 79: no remedySubir comment 80: empty commentSubir comment 81: Remedy = 8.3.1?Wolfgand comment 82, 83: empty commentVivek comment 85: Are you suggesting replacing the entire section?Vivek comment 92: Delete lines 22-43 in what page, what text to delete?Vivek comment 92: Which table? which section? what pages?Vivek 93: Delete Annex D? why? what reason? what about all the valuable 3GPP and3GPP2 events? why delete? what replaces it?Vivek 94: what page? section? [Vivek G Gupta] Please look in adjacent columnsWhat is the remedy? table 5? where is table 5?[Vivek G Gupta] Table 5 is in Draft version 2, page 42Vivek comments 95, 96: remedy is 5.5.4? Why are we removing MIH_MGMT_SAP?Vivek comment 97: remedy is 7? what is 7?Ronny comment 100: Remedy = 5.1.9?Ronny comment 109; empty comment as read by my commentary toolJin Lee comment 116: empty commentYoshihiro comment 120: Why remove table 6?Yoshihiro comment 122: why remove figure 22?Yoshihiro comment 123: why remove table 7?Yoshihiro comment 129, 130: Why remove annex C.2, C.3, C.4?Yoshihiro comment 133: empty commentSrinivas comment 134: why remove section 7.2.13 and 7.2.14?Srinivas comments 135, 136, 136: What is the next text?Srinivas comment 138; Why remove 7.2.16, 7.2.16, 7.2.17?Srinivas comment 139: Solve what? what is the proposed text change?Srinivas comments 140, 141: What is the proposed new text?Srinivas comment 142: what page? what is the new proposed text?Srinivas comment 143, 144: What page? what old text being changed? what is new text?Srinivas comment 145: Must be changed to allow also MIHF in network to accessinfo. Ok what is the proposed new text?Srinivas comment 145: empty commentQiaobing comment 161: empty commentBenjamin comment 163, 164: Insert in 6.2.2 and 6.3.3. where in relation toexisting text?Benjamin comment 165: What page? what section (my commentary tool reads section25???)Benjamin comment 166: empty commentPeretz Feder
|