I vote with Rich and Rick, Option 4
From: Rick Rabinovich [mailto:rrabinovich@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 10:59 AM
To: STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-3-400G] Electrical Ad-Hoc Straw Poll
Rick Rabinovich
Hardware Architect – Signal Integrity
Phone: +1 (818) 208-7328
26601 W. Agoura Rd.
Calabasas, CA 91302 US
visit: www.ixiacom.com
From: Richard Mellitz [mailto:richard.mellitz@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 5:11 AM
To: STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-3-400G] Electrical Ad-Hoc Straw Poll
I vote for option 4
... Rich
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 26, 2017, at 4:28 AM, Andre Szczepanek <aszczepanek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At today’s P802.3bs Electrical Ad-Hoc meeting I announced we would have a straw poll on options for the C2M Insertion Loss equation based on discussion following the presentation of mellitz_01b_042417_elect.
- Option 1: Do nothing
- Option 2:
– Change “The supported insertion loss budget is characterized by Equation (120E–1) and illustrated in Figure 120E–4. “ to “The recommended insertion loss budget is characterized by Equation (120E–1) and illustrated in Figure 120E–4. “
– Add “recommended” to the title of Figure 120E-4.
- Option 3: Change the insertion loss equation to the equation given in Slide 14 “Option B” of mellitz_01b_042417_elect.
- Option 4: Implement the changes in both options 2 & 3 above.
Please send me an email specifying your preferred option (select only one).
- Don’t get hung up on exact values. This is a straw poll, nothing is definitive – we just want to establish a direction for the group.
Regards
Andre Szczepanek (Electrical Ad Hoc chair)