Colleagues,
The following text was prepared today during the discussion of comment #301 against D2.1. Comment #301 and its associated comments were parked for offline discussion until the start of Day #4 (Thursday, 18 September 2025). Please review and discuss the
proposal with other participants in advance.
With regards,
-Kent
===============================================
Proposed changes?
[ILT|Start-up|Initialization] path
A series of adjacent ISLs and [related] sublayers that are specified to include ILT as defined in this annex. See Figure 178B–1.
Alternately, the path goes RS to RS with non-ILT ISL behavior unspecified.
?Note–An ILT path extends from RS to RS if all ISLs between are specified to include ILT.?
[Updated Figure 178B-1 to include a couple of examples.]
Somewhere: For other interfaces not specified to include ILT behaviour is not specified.