| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
All, again, apologies for the last-minute cancellation of today’s meeting. Rest assured, everything is OK with me and my family.
I intended to give a report on the Q2/5 meeting last week. I was able to get registered and got into the last half hour of the last session of Thursday. Then on Friday, I attended all the sessions. Of the
5 documents the PDCC reviewed last Wednesday, they had already reviewed two before I joined ((doc 108 and 133). Our only comments against those two documents was that one recommended 1kV and the other 1.5kV. the rapporteur informed me that these were competing
submissions from different entities to explain the discrepancy. Doc 154 and 158 were also related to the same topic. I put replies to yhe PDCC review in the documents and they are posted in the private area:
https://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/PDCC/private/Kseries/T25-SG05-C-0154!!MSW-E-PDCC-ITU.docx,
https://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/PDCC/private/Kseries/T25-SG05-C-0158!!MSW-E-PDCC-ITU.docx. All four docusm were deferred unitl the next meeting to allow time for the ITU group to discuss. They heard the response from the PDCC that the changes result in
an Ethernet implementation that does not comply to 802.3, and this is one of the things they plan to discuss. They did accept the change to the test “perfectly matched” in doc 158.
They reviewed K.147 and I walked them through the PDCC review. I took notes and posted:
https://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/PDCC/private/Kseries/T25-SG05-C-0062!R1!MSW-E-PDCC-ITU.docx. They accepted most of our comments. Nothing left would concern me. The document is moving to the Working Party for consent and I have posted the final version
for review:
https://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/PDCC/private/Kseries/T25-SG05-250603-TD-GEN-0348!!MSW-E.docx. Lastly, there was one other document that 802.3 was supposed to review, but I missed the email and therefore neglected to inform the group. This is a revision of K.Supple.25 “ITU-T K.117 - Long reach single
twisted-pair Ethernet resistibility testing”. They also deferred any action on this document to allow 802.3 time to review and comment (they were ready to send this to the Working Party, so they are being VERY accommodating to 802.3). I would request that
you review this document and filter any comments back to me (posted today):
https://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/PDCC/private/Kseries/T25-SG05-C-0063!R1!MSW-E.docx. I will not be able to host the PDCC ad hoc the NEXT TWO WEEKS as I am at the NFPA annual meeting next week and the following week I am otherwise occupied in California. Therefore, our next chance to meet is
2 July. I intend to discuss any comments on the newest version of K.147 and K.Suppl.25 in that meeting, plus any other agenda provided to me during the next two weeks.
Regards, Chad Jones Principal Engineer, Cisco Systems Executive Secretary, IEEE 802.3 Working Group Chair, IEEE P802.3da Task Force Principal, NFPA 70 CMP3 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-PDCC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-PDCC&A=1 |