Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.3_100G-OPTX] 802.3cu - Results of offline comment resolution discussions

Mike, I see where you are coming from on this.  Let’s change those two to accept.

Get Outlook for iOS
From: Mike Dudek <mdudek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 8:09:18 PM
To: David Lewis <David.Lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Maniloff, Eric <emanilof@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Gary Nicholl (gnicholl)' <gnicholl@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Mark Nowell (mnowell)' <mnowell@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: 802.3cu - Results of offline comment resolution discussions
 

Unfortunately I see  the responses to comments 103 and 104 have problems.   I should have been more precise in my comment wording.   The max channel attenuation with maximum number of worse case allowed connectors is 2.6dB.    The suggested use of the 3.0dB would require further clarification about the numbers of connectors allowed and would not support the higher number of connectors.  The use of the 2.6dB is the conservative single number that works for all allowed connector combinations.   A table could be created (similar to table 140-12) but when writing the comment I didn’t think that complexity was worth it.  

 

From: David Lewis <David.Lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 4:02 PM
To: STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Mike Dudek <mdudek@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Maniloff, Eric <emanilof@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Gary Nicholl (gnicholl)' <gnicholl@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Mark Nowell (mnowell)' <mnowell@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXT] 802.3cu - Results of offline comment resolution discussions

 

External Email

All,

In order to increase the speed of comment resolution in our teleconference calls, a group of us met off-line to work through some of the comments that were unresolved during our last call.  We came to the following proposed resolutions:

 

Comment #

Commenter

Topic

Proposed resolution

Note

54

Eric Maniloff

Tx Avg Power

Accept

 

103

Mike Dudek

Interop

Accept in principle

Max loss of DR channel is 3.0 dB, not 2.6.  So proposed value for max loss should increase by 0.4 dB to 5.2 dB.

104

Mike Dudek

Interop

Accept in principle

Max loss of DR channel is 3.0 dB, not 2.6.  So proposed value for max loss should increase by 0.4 dB to 4.5 dB.

105

Mike Dudek

Interop

Accept

 

106

Mike Dudek

Interop

Accept

 

115

Mike Dudek

Interop

Accept

 

116

Mike Dudek

Interop

Accept

 

 

During tomorrow’s call, we will ask if there are any objections to these resolutions, and if there are none, we will move on to other topics.

 

Thanks,

David Lewis

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX&A=1