RE: [EFM] final comment response?
Title: final comment response?
All,
1) If
any of my comment responses are delaying the publication of
responses (useful for Kim), please remind
me which responses
are due I was a bit frazzled at last week's Las Vegas IEEE
meeting.
2) Is
anyone aware of an 802.3ah WG resolution that requested
IEEE
Staff perform extensive changes in the (thought to be
stable)
next-generation FrameMaker template
project?
These
extensive changes were (apparently) perceived by IEEE
Staff
to
have broad 802.3 support, and were therefore
implemented.
Unfortunately, the extent and secretive nature
of these changes
exceeded the limits of the 802 and MMSC
adhoc volunteers.
As a
result, development of the next-generation templates has
been
cancelled, with significant (although managable) consequences:
1) Robust full-featured templates will not be
available from IEEE Staff.
2) Delayed bug fixes (including the
"white last line" split-table
"feature").
3) Sponsors and individuals have lost
their unique opportunity to refine the
FrameMaker templates through a
fair&equitable public review process.
If a
formal Ancona resolution was accepted, but vocalized
incorrectly,
perhaps some of the damage could be
corrected.
DVJ
David V. James
3180 South Ct
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Home:
+1.650.494.0926
+1.650.856.9801
Cell:
+1.650.954.6906
Fax: +1.360.242.5508
Base: dvj@alum.mit.edu
Hi,
Why isn't there the final comment response from the Ancona
meeting on the web?
regards,
Chan Kim
============================================
Chan Kim
ETRI
161
Gajeong-dong,Yuseong-goo, Daejon, 305-350 Korea
cell :
+82-16-418-9152
office : +82-42-860-5773
fax : +82-42-860-5213
email :
ckim@etri.re.kr
============================================