Advantages of Enhanced Tx/T2 Proposal for 1000BASE-T Sailesh K. Rao Level One Communications, Inc. 1. 125MHz ADC and 125MHz clocking throughout. -> 5.5bit effective ADC for 3dB margin. -> Simplest ADC among all proposals. -> No latency losses at clock domain boundaries. 2. Uses 1Volt per level effective separation at transmitter with 2V ptp launch level. -> Best noise margin under Crane Test == 100BASE-Tx. -> 33-level PR requires 32.0V ptp. = 32.0Volts (for 1Volt separation between levels) X 0.707 (3dB gain from 1+D decorrelator) X 1.4 (loss due to increased symbol rate from 125 to 167MHz) X 1.0 (no gain from FEC due to hard decision decoding) -> 17-level PR requires 16.0V ptp. = 16.0Volts (for 1Volt separation between levels) X 0.707 (3dB gain from 1+D decorrelator) X 1.4 (loss due to increased symbol rate from 125 to 167MHz) -> 9-level PR requires 8.0V ptp. = 8.0Volts (for 1Volt separation between levels) X 0.707 (3dB gain from 1+D decorrelator) X 1.4 (loss due to increased symbol rate from 125 to 167MHz) X 1.0 (no gain from FEC due to hard decision decoding) -> CAP-12 requires 6.0V ptp. = 2.0Volts (original CAP-9 ptp voltage) X 3/2 (to go from 3-levels to 4-levels per dimension) X 4.0 (to go from CAP-9 noise immunity to 100BASE-Tx noise immunity) X 0.5 (assumed 6dB gain due to 24-D block coding) -> QAM-25 requires 5.1V ptp. = 1.8Volts (QAM-25 ptp voltage) X 4.0 (to go from QAM-25 noise immunity to 100BASE-Tx noise immunity) X 0.707 (3dB gain from 4-D block coding) -> QAM-36 requires 4.5V ptp. = 1.8Volts (QAM-25 ptp voltage) X 5/4 (to go from 5-levels to 6-levels per dimension) X 4.0 (to go from QAM-25 noise immunity to 100BASE-Tx noise immunity) X 0.5 (6dB gain from 8-D block coding) -> Dual CAP-64 requires 24.0V ptp. = 2.0Volts (CAP-9 ptp voltage) X 7/2 (to go from 3-levels to 8-levels per dimension) X 4.0 (to go from CAP-9 noise immunity to 100BASE-Tx noise immunity) 3. Packet Delimiters are much better protected codes than normal data. -> Impossible to achieve this by just adding one more level in a 16-level code! 4. Falls back to 100BASE-Tx by design. -> No overhead for 100/1000 designs. 5. Complies with the requirement of Ethernet to handle packets of any length. -> CAP-12 with 24-D coding requires packet length to be a multiple of 36 bits? -> RS-Coded PR requires packet length to be a multiple of 120 bits?